The effectiveness of tutoring programs

Tutoring programs refer to structured and organized initiatives designed to provide additional academic support and guidance to students (usually outside of regular classroom instruction).

The effectiveness of tutoring programs
Image credit: Kampus Production

Tutoring programs refer to structured and organized initiatives designed to provide additional academic support and guidance to students (usually outside of regular classroom instruction). These programs typically involve one-on-one or small group interactions between a tutor and students, aiming to address specific learning needs. This article delves into the effectiveness of tutoring programs on academic achievement, drawing insights from research papers and case studies.

💡 Lessons learnt: The good educator explains. The better educator demonstrates. The great educator inspires.

The 2 Sigma problem

The "2 sigma problem," introduced by Benjamin Bloom, encapsulates a challenge in education related to the effectiveness of various instructional methods. The "2 sigma problem" addresses the vast difference in learning outcomes between students engaged in one-to-one tutoring compared to those in conventional group instruction.

Bloom's groundbreaking work aimed to explore methods of group instruction that could match the learning outcomes achieved through individualized, one-on-one tutoring. The research found that students receiving personalized, tutor-guided instruction performed, on average, two standard deviations better than students undergoing traditional classroom instruction. This substantial difference highlighted a significant gap in the efficiency of various instructional approaches, posing a challenge to educators and researchers alike.

The implications of the "2 Sigma problem" underscore the need for tutoring programs to facilitate student learning. Tutoring programs serve as a cornerstone in the educational support structure, offering personalized assistance to students. As highlighted by researchers Cohen, Kulik, and Kulik, tutoring provides individualized attention, allowing for a tailored approach to address the unique learning needs of each student.

While not a practical solution for large-scale implementation due to resource constraints, it urges educators to seek instructional methods that incorporate personalized, individualized elements, even within the constraints of group settings. The quest to address the "2 sigma problem" has spurred ongoing research and discussions on optimizing teaching methods to provide students with a more effective and personalized learning experience.

Enhanced Student Confidence and Motivation

Beyond academic gains, tutoring programs play a pivotal role in boosting students' confidence and motivation. A case study conducted by Clark, Nguyen, and Sweller delves into the psychological aspects of tutoring. The study suggests that the personalized attention and encouragement provided by tutors contribute significantly to enhancing students' self-esteem, making them more engaged and motivated learners. When students experience success and progress through the tailored support of tutors, it not only impacts their academic performance but also builds and fosters a positive attitude toward facilitating learning.

Tutoring programs and learning loss

Tutoring programs have also gained considerable attention due to their potential to mitigate the learning loss that students may face during extended school closures or vacations. Research shows that students often experience a decline in academic achievement during long periods without regular instruction and structured learning activities. This phenomenon, known as "summer slide" can be particularly detrimental to low-income, minority, and disadvantaged students who may have limited access to educational resources outside of school.

Tutoring programs play a role in preventing or reducing learning loss by providing targeted instruction and personalized support to students. A study conducted by RAND Corporation found that students who received tutoring over the summer showed significant improvements in their math skills compared to their peers who did not receive tutoring. Similarly, a meta-analysis of 96 studies on tutoring programs revealed that one-on-one tutoring led to substantial gains in student achievement across various subject areas and grade levels.

Tutors can identify students' strengths, weaknesses, and learning styles and tailor their instruction accordingly. By doing so, they help students grasp difficult concepts, reinforce foundational skills, and fill gaps in their knowledge.

Practical Implementation and Considerations

  1. Selection of qualified tutors: Tutors should possess not only expertise in the subject matter but also effective communication and interpersonal skills. Providing ongoing professional development opportunities for tutors ensures they stay abreast of best practices, enhancing their ability to address diverse learning needs.
  2. Regular monitoring of student progress: Implementing assessment mechanisms to track the impact of tutoring on academic achievement allows for timely adjustments and optimizations. This involves collecting and analyzing data on both individual and collective student outcomes, enabling educators to make informed decisions on program efficacy
  3. Adapting strategies based on individual needs: Recognizing that students have unique learning styles and preferences ensures that tutoring programs remain flexible and responsive to diverse educational requirements. The ability to tailor tutoring approaches to accommodate individual differences maximizes the impact of these programs on student achievement.


Adiutor means "helper" - we do just that, by taking a load of your school administration and helping you focus on what matters most: the kids.


Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237–248. doi:10.3102/00028312019002237

Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320. doi:10.3102/00346543071002279

Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16. doi:10.3102/0013189X013006004

Clark, R. E., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. John Sweller, 73–90.

Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., ... Sussex, W. (2013). Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from the First Student Cohort. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.

Cooper, H., Nye, B., Charlton, K., Lindsay, J., & Greathouse, S. (1996). The effects of summer vacation on achievement test scores: A narrative and meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 227-268.

Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Liu, J. (2020). Projecting the potential impacts of COVID-19 school closures on academic achievement. EdWorkingPapers.

Neitzel, A., Lake, C., Pellegrini, M., & Slavin, R. (2020). A synthesis of quantitative research on programs for struggling readers in elementary schools. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(4), 818-854.

Schwartz, Heather L., Jennifer Sloan McCombs, Catherine H. Augustine, and Jennifer T. Leschitz, Getting to Work on Summer Learning: Recommended Practices for Success, 2nd Ed. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2018.

Torgesen, J., Houston, D., Rissman, L., Decker, S., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Francis, D., Rivera Mojetta, C., & Lesaux, N. (2018). Academic language tutoring to improve reading comprehension and content learning for at-risk ninth-grade students: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness,