Outcome Based Learning and Student Achievement

In contrast to the common practice where many educators primarily focus on the content they deliver rather than their students' learning process, Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) places a strong emphasis on

Lined up wooden cubes with check sign on top
Image credit: Oatawa

In contrast to the common practice where many educators primarily focus on the content they deliver rather than their students' learning process, Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) places a strong emphasis on the desired outcomes that students are expected to attain upon completing their coursework, rather than solely on the methods they use to attain them. It's centered around defining clear learning outcomes or objectives that students should achieve by the end of a course or program. OBE shifts the focus from what educators teach to what students should learn and be able to demonstrate.

💡 Lessons learnt: A clear destination ensures a well-defined route to success

One of the key figures associated with its development is William Spady, who is often regarded as the pioneer of OBE. Spady's work in the 1980s and 1990s played a significant role in popularizing the approach. OBE gained attention as a response to concerns about traditional education systems that often emphasized what was taught rather than what students learned. OBE as we know it today has seen widespread adoption in various countries, including the United States and South Africa, in the late 20th century.

What Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) Entails

  1. Clear Learning Outcomes: At the core of OBE is the identification of clear and specific learning outcomes. Educators collaborate to define what students should know and be able to do by the end of a course, program, or grade level.
  2. Alignment: All elements of education, including curriculum design, teaching methods, and assessment strategies, are aligned with these defined outcomes. This alignment ensures that everything in the educational process is geared towards achieving the desired goals.
  3. Assessment for Learning: Continuous assessment and feedback are integral to OBE. Formative assessments are used to monitor student progress, identify areas where additional support may be needed, and make necessary adjustments to instruction.
  4. Competency-Based Education: OBE often incorporates a competency-based approach, where students must demonstrate their mastery of specific skills or competencies before progressing to the next level.
  5. Student-Centered Learning: OBE places a strong emphasis on catering to individual student needs and learning styles. It recognizes that students may progress at different rates and offers flexibility in how they can achieve the defined outcomes.

Effects of Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) on Student Learning

  1. Improved Clarity of Objectives: OBE's emphasis on well-defined learning outcomes provides students with a clear understanding of what is expected. When students know what they should achieve, they are more likely to set clear goals and work diligently to reach them.
  2. Enhanced Student Engagement: The student-centered nature of OBE encourages active participation and engagement in the learning process. When students are actively involved in setting goals and tracking their progress, they tend to be more motivated and committed to their studies.
  3. Customized Learning Paths: OBE recognizes that students have diverse learning needs and paces. It allows for customized learning paths, enabling students to progress at their own rates and focus on areas where they need improvement.
  4. Focus on Mastery: OBE often incorporates a mastery-based approach, where students are required to demonstrate proficiency before moving forward. This focus on mastery ensures that students have a strong foundation in essential skills and knowledge.
  5. Holistic Assessment: Rather than relying solely on traditional exams, OBE encourages a variety of assessment methods. This approach provides a more comprehensive view of students' abilities and allows for the assessment of higher-order thinking skills.
  6. Long-Term Skill Development: OBE aims to equip students with skills and competencies that are not only relevant in the short term but also valuable in the long run. This focus on lifelong learning can contribute to sustained academic success and adaptability in a rapidly changing world.

Principles of Outcome-Based Assessment

Outcome-Based Assessment (OBA) is an integral component of Outcomes-Based Education (OBE) and plays a pivotal role in helping guage student progress. OBA is a systematic approach to assessment that places paramount importance on aligning assessment methods with specific learning outcomes or objectives. It aims to ensure that the assessments used in educational settings effectively measure what students are expected to know and be able to do.

  1. Alignment with Learning Outcomes: OBA starts by clearly defining the intended learning outcomes. These outcomes serve as the foundation for designing assessments. Each assessment task is carefully crafted to measure the extent to which students have achieved these outcomes.
  2. Validity and Reliability: Validity refers to the extent to which an assessment accurately measures what it is intended to measure. Reliability concerns the consistency of assessment results. OBA strives to create assessments that are both valid and reliable, ensuring that they provide a true reflection of student performance.
  3. Clear Criteria and Rubrics: To facilitate objective evaluation, OBA employs clear assessment criteria and rubrics. These tools delineate the expected standards of performance and help assessors provide constructive feedback.
  4. Authentic Assessment: Authentic assessments mirror real-world tasks and challenges, enabling students to apply their knowledge and skills in practical contexts. OBA  favors authentic assessments as they encourage deeper understanding.

Practices in Outcome-Based Assessment

OBA adopts a range of assessment practices designed to measure student attainment of learning outcomes:

  1. Performance Tasks: Performance tasks require students to apply their knowledge and skills in authentic scenarios. For instance, in a science class, students might conduct experiments or analyze data to demonstrate their understanding of scientific principles.
  2. Portfolios: Portfolios compile a student's work over time, showcasing their growth and achievements. They provide a holistic view of student progress and allow for self-assessment
  3. Rubrics: Rubrics are scoring tools that outline specific criteria for assessment. They provide transparency and consistency in evaluating student work.

Adiutor

Adiutor means "helper" - we do just that, by taking a load of your school administration and helping you focus on what matters most: the kids.

References:

Khairul U, Demmu K , Winara , M. Irfan. Implementation of Outcome Based Education Physical Education Study Program for Elementary School Teacher Education

O'Neill, G., & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-centered learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(3), 181-190.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Wong, K. C., & Holcombe, E. (2016). Student engagement and educational outcomes in higher education: A synthesis of empirical literature. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 1-19.

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). American Council on Education/Macmillan.

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32(2), 16-25.

Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & Meyer, C. A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60-63.

Arter, J. A., & McTighe, J. (2001). Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Corwin Press.

Wiggins, G. P. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2(2), 1-2.