5 qualities of a great educational leader

Educational leadership holds the key to fostering a thriving learning environment, nurturing competent teachers, and ensuring students' holistic growth. As the demands of education evolve, so do the expectations from educational leaders. Today, schools require leaders who can effectively navigate challenges, inspire their teams, and foster a culture of continuous improvement. This article delves into the demands of educational leadership in modern schools, exploring both administrative and teacher leadership roles. We will identify five essential qualities that exceptional educational leaders possess, examining how they impact the overall success of schools.

Demands of Educational Leadership in Today's Schools

Educational leadership today is more complex than ever before. Leaders are expected to navigate an ever-changing educational landscape, addressing issues such as student diversity, digital transformation, and community engagement (Hale, 2019). The role of a leader goes beyond administrative tasks; they are now visionaries, advocates, and change agents (Portin et al., 2009). Today's educational leaders must foster an inclusive and equitable environment, promoting cultural competence and embracing the diversity of their students and staff (Kohli & Solórzano, 2012). In addition to all this, they still need to remain adaptable, open to innovation, and willing to collaborate with all stakeholders to drive positive change (Leithwood & Jantzi, 1999). This begs the question, how is this achieved and how does it all come together?

Five Qualities of Educational Leadership for Both Administrative and Teacher Leaders

a) Vision and Purpose: Exceptional educational leaders possess a clear vision for their schools, aligning their actions with a common purpose (Leithwood & Mascall, 2008). They inspire others with their passion for education, fostering a shared sense of purpose among teachers and students alike (Elmore, 2000). A strong vision guides decision-making encourages innovation, and sets the trajectory for continuous improvement.

b) Effective Communication: Communication is a cornerstone of effective leadership (Wahlstrom & Louis, 2008). Great educational leaders are skilled communicators who listen actively, articulate their vision clearly, and build trust through transparent and open communication (Day et al., 2009). They foster a culture of collaboration, where feedback is welcomed and ideas are valued.

c) Emotional Intelligence: Emotional intelligence plays a significant role in effective leadership (Goleman, 1998). Leaders who possess emotional intelligence are empathetic, self-aware, and capable of understanding the needs and emotions of others (Van Maele et al., 2018). They foster positive relationships with their team, creating a supportive and encouraging environment that enhances teacher satisfaction and student well-being.

d) Instructional Leadership: Both administrative and teacher leaders must be instructional leaders who prioritize teaching and learning (Hallinger, 2011). They support teachers in refining their instructional practices, promoting evidence-based teaching strategies (Robinson et al., 2009). These leaders collaborate with teachers to set goals, provide feedback, and monitor progress toward improved student learning outcomes. They are abreast with current educational instructional trends which will be of great benefit to their school.

e) Shared Leadership: Exceptional educational leaders embrace shared leadership, distributing leadership responsibilities across their teams (Harris & Muijs, 2005). They recognize the expertise and contributions of others, encouraging teacher leadership and involving stakeholders in decision-making processes (Crowther et al., 2012). Shared leadership fosters a sense of ownership and accountability among all school community members.

Case Study: Educational Leadership at Logwood School

Ms. Paterson, the newly appointed principal at Logwood School, exemplified transformational leadership by implementing specific actions that aligned with the five essential qualities of educational leadership.

Vision and Purpose:

Action: Ms. Paterson engaged the school community, including teachers, students, parents, and staff, in a collaborative visioning process. She conducted focus group discussions and surveys to understand the stakeholders' aspirations and expectations for the school.

Outcome: Through this inclusive approach, Ms. Paterson cultivated a shared vision emphasising student-centred learning, character development, and a commitment to academic excellence. The vision articulated a clear direction for the school, guiding decision-making and inspiring everyone to work toward a common purpose.

Effective Communication:

Action: Ms. Paterson prioritized transparent and open communication with all stakeholders. She held regular staff meetings, town hall gatherings, and parent forums to provide updates on school initiatives, policies, and events. Additionally, she encouraged an open-door policy, making herself accessible to teachers, students, and parents for discussions and feedback.

Outcome: The culture of open communication fostered trust and collaboration among all members of the school community. Teachers felt empowered to share their ideas, concerns, and insights, leading to constructive discussions and improved decision-making. Parents appreciated the transparency, which enhanced their engagement with the school.

Emotional Intelligence:

Action: Ms. Paterson demonstrated empathy and understanding toward the challenges faced by teachers, staff, and students. She regularly checked with her team to assess their well-being and offered support during difficult times. She also celebrated individual and collective achievements, recognizing the efforts of teachers and students alike.

Outcome: By displaying emotional intelligence, Ms. Paterson created a positive and supportive work environment. Teachers felt valued and appreciated, leading to increased job satisfaction and commitment to the school's mission. Students felt a sense of belonging, which enhanced their overall well-being and academic engagement.

Instructional Leadership:

Action: Ms. Paterson was also actively engaged in instructional leadership. She observed teaching practices, provided constructive feedback, and identified areas for improvement. She encouraged teachers to participate in professional development workshops and collaborative learning communities to enhance their instructional strategies.

Outcome: Ms. Paterson's instructional leadership helped teachers refine their pedagogical skills and adopt evidence-based teaching practices. The focus on instructional improvement positively impacted student learning outcomes, leading to increased academic achievement across grade levels.

Shared Leadership:

Action: Ms. Paterson embraced shared leadership by involving teachers, parents, and community members in decision-making processes. She understood one person can't do it all. She established committees for curriculum development, school events, and parent involvement, encouraging participation from various stakeholders who she knew had her students' best interests at heart.

Outcome: Shared leadership empowered teachers, parents, and community members to take ownership of the school's success. It fostered a sense of collective responsibility and commitment to the school's goals. As a result, initiatives gained broader support, and the school community felt more invested in the overall improvement of Logwood School.

Good educational leadership is a multifaceted role that demands vision, effective communication, emotional intelligence, instructional expertise, and shared leadership. Both administrative and teacher leaders play pivotal roles in shaping the success of schools and the academic growth of students. As we enlighten the impact of exceptional leadership, we recognize that the future of education rests on leaders who inspire and empower, creating brighter prospects for our students and the communities they serve.

References

Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School leadership & management, 34(5), 553-571. doi: 10.1080/13632434.2014.928682

Crowther, F., Kaagan, S. S., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2009). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Corwin Press.

Crowther, F., & Ferguson, M. (2012). Developing teacher leadership within a distributed leadership context. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(6), 682-702. doi: 10.1177/1741143212452882

Cummings, W. K., & Kirkman, B. L. (1998). Effects of leader feedback on leader performance and on group members' perceptions of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 715-722. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.715

Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., ... & Kington, A. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. Final report. Research Report DCSF-RR108.

Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.

Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.

Hale, J. E. (2019). From teacher to school leader: Effective strategies for transformational leadership. Rowman & Littlefield.

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for 21st century schools: From instructional leadership to leadership for learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 122-142. doi: 10.1108/09578231111106892

Harris, A. (2005). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(6), 693-713. doi: 10.1177/1741143205060846

Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Open University Press.

Harrison, C., & Killion, J. (2007). Ten roles for teacher leaders. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 74-77.

Kohli, R., & Solórzano, D. G. (2012). Teachers, please learn our names!: Racial microaggressions and the K-12 classroom. Race Ethnicity and Education, 15(4), 441-462. doi: 10.1080/13613324.2012.688052

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). The relative effects of principal and teacher sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 679-706. doi: 10.1177/0013161X99356002

Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529-561. doi: 10.1177/0013161X08321501

Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Philadelphia, PA: Laboratory for Student Success.

Portin, B. S., Knapp, M. S., Dareff, S., Feldman, S., Russell, F. A., & Sammons, P. (2009). Leadership for learning improvement in urban schools. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2009). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(3), 315-347. doi: 10.1177/0013161X08330506

Van Maele, D., Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. (2018). The role of emotional intelligence in the relationship between teacher emotional labour and employee functioning. Social Psychology of Education, 21(1), 185-200. doi: 10.1007/s11218-018-9419-5

Wahlstrom, K. L., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458-495. doi: 10.1177/0013161X08321500